There will come a time when HOA board member recusal will be necessary. Certain situations warrant recusal, particularly if the board member is directly involved or affected by the decision. It is imperative to know what drives a recusal, how it occurs, and when a forced recusal is warranted.
Is HOA Board Member Recusal Legally Required?
Recusal means removing oneself from a discussion or decision that directly affects or involves them. When a conflict of interest arises, recusing an HOA board member involved is often necessary. In fact, many state laws and governing documents require directors to avoid conflicts of interest by recusing themselves.
Even when laws and bylaws don’t expressly require it, recusal is still best practice. This way, board members can avoid potentially breaching their fiduciary duties. If a board member participates in a conflict of interest, they can expose the association and themselves to legal problems.
When Should an HOA Board Member Recuse Themselves?
It can be tricky to know when a board member must recuse themselves from a vote. As cases can vary, it is important to recognize what counts as a possible HOA board conflict of interest.
Generally, board members must recuse themselves if the decision involves the following:
1. Financial Interest in the Decision
A board member should step aside if they could financially gain from the outcome of a vote or contract. Examples include voting on a contract involving the board member’s company, approving payments to a family member, and deciding on work that benefits property owned by the board member.
2. Personal or Family Relationships
It can be difficult to avoid mingling personal and professional relationships, especially in small towns or communities. Sometimes, there’s no other vendor right for a job except the one owned by a board member’s relative.
When the matter involves a personal or familial relationship, recusal is often appropriate. This includes matters involving spouses, children, relatives, close friends, or business partners. Even if the board member does not directly profit, claims of favoritism can still arise, damaging owner trust in the process.
3. Disciplinary or Enforcement Matters Involving the Board Member
A board member should not participate in hearings or enforcement decisions that involve their own violation. Boards must remain impartial during enforcement proceedings, and it is difficult to do that when the alleged offender participates in the discussion or vote.
This also applies to violations committed by a board member’s tenant or family member. Even if it is possible for the director to separate their personal feelings or relationships from the decision, the mere appearance of bias or selective enforcement can lead to legal issues.
4. Pending Litigation
If the board member is personally involved in a lawsuit against the association, recusal is often necessary for related discussions. The same applies if the association is pursuing claims against a board member.
5. Bias or Inability to be Objective
Sometimes, there is no direct financial conflict, but emotions or personal disputes can make it impossible to stay neutral. Common examples include long-running neighbor disputes, personal grudges, harassment allegations, and heated political or social conflicts. Recusal may help protect the board’s credibility.
6. Confidential or Privileged Matters
Board members deal with sensitive or private information all the time. That said, a board member may need to recuse themselves if they improperly obtained confidential information, they are a witness in the matter, or their participation could waive the attorney-client privilege.
In Virginia, associations may hold executive sessions (Section 55.1-1816) to discuss pending litigation, unexecuted contracts, and matters of personal liability, among other things. In practice, this could lead to recusing a director if the board must discuss claims against that director or if the director is threatening legal action against the HOA.
How Does HOA Board Member Recusal Work?
The process depends on state law and governing documents, but it usually involves the steps below.
- Disclosure. First, the director involved will disclose the conflict of interest to the rest of the board.
- Recordation. The board will then document the disclosure in the meeting minutes. This helps create a clear record that the director followed proper procedures.
- Abstention. Next, the board member will remove themselves from the discussion and vote thereafter. This is so they don’t affect the other directors. Sometimes it is necessary for the director involved to leave the room entirely.
Is Abstaining the Same as Recusal?
Abstaining shares similar qualities to recusal, but they are not always the same. An abstention simply means that the board member doesn’t get a vote.
Recusal, on the other hand, is much broader. It generally means that the board member avoids participating in the discussion and subsequent vote entirely. Even just being present for the discussion can make it seem like there’s something questionable going on.
Can the Board Force an HOA Board Member’s Recusal?
Sometimes, a board member may have a conflict of interest but refuse to recuse themselves. In such cases, other directors may want to forcibly remove that board member from the discussion and vote.
Forced recusal may be permitted, but it depends on state laws and the governing documents. Most HOA boards don’t automatically have the authority to force another director to recuse themselves.
That said, there are situations where forced recusal becomes more likely or appropriate. A common example is a clear conflict of interest in financial decisions or enforcement hearings. An attorney may also advise recusal during an executive session. In some cases, HOA board ethics policies may warrant the recusal.
Of course, it is important to exercise caution when forcing a recusal. Such a decision can be controversial, especially when the board uses it in a political manner rather than out of concern for ethics breaches.
A forced recusal should never be used to:
- Exclude a dissenting board member
- Prevent debate
- Silence criticism
- Manipulate votes
Additionally, the board generally can’t remove a director from office or deny them participation rights simply because other directors disagree with them. It is normal for directors to disagree on matters involving association business. A healthy debate and a democratic vote are all par for the course.
The Best Course of Action
Navigating HOA board member recusal can be confusing, especially to boards with little to no experience. When in doubt, it is always a good idea to consult a legal professional or HOA management company for advice. This way, the association can limit exposure to liability down the road.
Keymont Community Management offers expert management services to associations in Virginia, Maryland, and Washington, DC. Call us today at 703.752.8300 or request a proposal to start your journey!
RELATED ARTICLES:
- HOA Board Abuse Of Power: How Boards Can Prevent Overreach
- 13 Common Issues In A HOA That The Board Must Be Ready For
- Hoarding In HOAs: Are There Regulations In Virginia?
